|
|
Post by John - Chicago Bulls on Aug 29, 2012 23:21:21 GMT -5
Bulls Recieve
===================
Ronnie Brewer
2yr/8mil (4/4)
Player Option: No
Team Option: No
Trade Clause: No
The Charlotte Bobcats first round pick
Bobcats Recieve
===================
Carlos Boozer
2yr/18m (9/9)
Player Option - No
Team Option - Yes (3rd Year/9m)
Trade Clause - No
===============================
===============================
===============================
Chicago Bulls, Salary Cap - 54.1m/65m
After Trade - 49.1m/65m
Charlotte Bobcats salarp cap - 53.5m/65m
After Trade 58.5m/65m
================================
|
|
|
|
Post by Lynch on Aug 29, 2012 23:22:07 GMT -5
I accept.
|
|
|
|
Post by John - Chicago Bulls on Aug 29, 2012 23:23:06 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by ATK on Aug 30, 2012 0:47:57 GMT -5
Accepts.
|
|
|
|
Post by Commish Styles on Aug 30, 2012 9:31:39 GMT -5
First of.. no explanations by both teams and second off..
Whys a guy that averages 3.9 ppg (Ronnie Brewer) being traded for Carlos Boozer thats averaging 12.8 points and around 9 rebounds a game? Am I missing something there..
The bulls get worse and the bobcats get better
|
|
|
|
Post by John - Chicago Bulls on Aug 30, 2012 9:50:20 GMT -5
Gehad i have depth at PF and im trying to get a few 1st round draft picks lol.
im not gonna do a trade that doesnt benefit my team in some way.
|
|
|
|
Post by John - Chicago Bulls on Aug 30, 2012 11:51:27 GMT -5
/
|
|
|
|
Post by Lynch on Aug 30, 2012 12:08:07 GMT -5
Bulls get a great defender in Brewer. It adds more depth to his team at the SG position. As well as, a 1st round pick which could result in a 70s overall player.
Bobcats get an upgrade at the PF position, a man who can get you points and boards. Boozer will be an upgrade over Blair.
Also, if he has a depth at PF then he does not mind shipping one of his PFs.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mitch Kupchak on Aug 30, 2012 12:08:52 GMT -5
Seems the Bulls organization has the ultimate trust in Al Harrington to go through with this trade. & as for Bobcats, adds a veteran PF capable of being real fkin productive. I approve
|
|
|
|
Post by Commish Styles on Aug 30, 2012 12:13:17 GMT -5
I will go ahead and say that my decision as far as this trade goes is "denied". I still dont see why the bulls are giving away a very productive PF for one who literally does nothing on the court besides play defense.
This trade will be decided with Marcus's decision.
|
|
|
|
Post by Breezy Stern on Aug 30, 2012 12:38:03 GMT -5
You pretty much tradin a valuable PF for a poor man's defensive player? lawd only thing that'd be worse would be Tony Allen for Kevin Garnett.
Declined.
Try and work out a trade that gives both sides equal talent, cuz this trade is givin up a still valuable veteran PF for a SG who can hardly add production. or maybe another player instead of a draft pick. NBA 1st round picks aren't like an NFL one.
|
|
